‘Leave the World Behind’ Ending Explained: Rumaan Alam on the Significance of ‘Friends’ and the Accuracy of That Final Theory
Rumaan Alam discusses the ending of his novel turned Netflix film 'Leave the World Behind', and the significance of the 'Friends' ending.
Deviations from the Book and the 'Friends' Ending
Rumaan Alam, the author of 'Leave the World Behind,' discusses the deviations the film makes from the book, particularly with the ending. He explains that the ending of the film, which includes the final season of 'Friends,' is a jolt of humor that is satisfying and rewarding. Alam believes it is a self-reflective statement about the power of the medium of television and its hold over the character in the story. Although it may be seen as funny, it is not meant to be a joke, but rather a reminder that art can be a source of comfort.
In the book, it is more implied that the families reunite, with Rose planning to return to the house with supplies. However, in the movie, it is left unclear whether they will find Rose or if she will stay in the bunker watching 'Friends' forever. Alam states that he, along with the film's director, Sam Esmail, do not have a definitive answer. They believe the open-endedness allows the audience to interpret and possess their own conclusion.
The Explanation and Uncertainty
The film provides a detailed explanation by the character G.H. about what he thinks is happening. However, Alam reveals that he did not have a specific idea in mind when writing the book. He wanted to leave it open for interpretation, allowing readers to bring their own frame of reference to the story. G.H.'s monologue in the film is based on his own experiences and knowledge, but Alam points out that another character's perspective might offer a different explanation. The uncertainty and different interpretations add depth to the story, similar to how people discuss and interpret art.
In the scene where G.H. shows his fear for the first time, Alam suggests that the gravity of the situation may have clicked for him in that moment. G.H. describes a scenario of attack that induces uncertainty in the population, which parallels what he is experiencing. The fear comes from not knowing the true nature of the events unfolding.
No Closure and the Power of the Film
Alam explains that it was intentional to not provide closure at the end of the film by showing the families reunited. He believes it would be dissatisfying and goes against the nature of the story. The film respects the viewers enough to leave it open-ended and not spoon-feed them a resolution. It is a story that doesn't require a neat, happy ending. Instead, it leaves room for interpretation and discussion.
Alam concludes the interview by expressing his appreciation for the audience's response to the ending. He mentions that the theatrical experience of watching the film is powerful, with viewers unsure of how to interpret the ending. Some find it funny, others find it scary, but regardless, it sparks conversation and engages the audience in a unique way.
